|
|
07-29-2008, 02:18 PM
|
#1
|
Established Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: chuckey
Posts: 30
M.O.C. #1717
|
K & N Intake Kits for Duramax
Has anyone had any experience with a K & N FIPK generation II intake kit or K & N 77-series intake kit for duramax diesels? If so, how did it work, did it help power and mileage? Would appreciate any info you might have. Thanks, Rex and Sharon (go 185) MOC 1717.
|
|
|
07-29-2008, 03:35 PM
|
#2
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clearwater
Posts: 10,917
M.O.C. #420
|
This past May I had the Banks Ram Air installed on my 05 Duramax. I immediately noticed an increase in HP and Torque. I don't pay attention to fuel mileage so I can't help you there. I got mine at CW and the total price was around $500 installed.
|
|
|
07-29-2008, 04:33 PM
|
#3
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Myers
Posts: 5,933
M.O.C. #4282
|
I have a K & N intake system and filter for my 2002 Duramax. I was going to sell it, but someone here on the forum talked me into keeping it. I don't have it on, so I can't tell you how it works...
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 04:52 AM
|
#4
|
Montana Fan
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: _
Posts: 125
M.O.C. #6348
|
I installed a Volant Cold Air Intake on my Dodge Cummins as well as a 4" exhaust and a Diablo Power Puck and there was a DEFINITE increase in HP/Torque and mpg. I got all the stuff from www.xtremediesl.com and installed it myself.
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 05:08 AM
|
#5
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,376
M.O.C. #6575
|
I recall DieselPlace.com doing extensive research on air filters, and IIRC, the results did not favor the K & N. I was cautioned against the K & N by a mechanic back in East TX. Some of the sensors simply don't like the oil you apply to the filter after it is washed. Depending on the year model of your Duramax, CoolMyDuramax has a cold air intake that might help with airflow.
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 05:38 AM
|
#6
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Myers
Posts: 5,933
M.O.C. #4282
|
Will, you are right. The mass airflow sensor was the problem with oil coming through the filter and messing that up. I do know that there are some who absolutely swear by the K & N, though.
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 06:44 AM
|
#7
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine
Posts: 1,445
M.O.C. #538
|
Any of the foam type filters can be (and usually are) over oiled. JMHO
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 07:36 AM
|
#8
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clearwater
Posts: 10,917
M.O.C. #420
|
The Banks Ram-Air filter is a lifetime filter and only requires cleaning every 50,000 to 100,000 miles. By the time mine needs cleaning I'll be ready for a new truck as I already have over 60,000 miles on this truck.
So far it has done everything it is advertised to do.
Banks Ram-Air--04 - 05 Chevy/GMC 6.6L Duramax
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 08:42 AM
|
#9
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,376
M.O.C. #6575
|
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by Glenn and Lorraine
The Banks Ram-Air filter is a lifetime filter and only requires cleaning every 50,000 to 100,000 miles. By the time mine needs cleaning I'll be ready for a new truck as I already have over 60,000 miles on this truck.
So far it has done everything it is advertised to do.
Banks Ram-Air--04 - 05 Chevy/GMC 6.6L Duramax
|
Just curious how you decide it needs cleaning? Filter minder? Visual inspection? I do like the idea of the complete intake, as I have read bad things lately about the stock air intake on the LLY engine (restricted airflow). Seems the later model engine intake can be retrofitted to the LLY turbo, but the run on them by LLY owners has them back ordered everywhere. Here is the thread if any of you guys would like to read that. Seems to increase MPG.
Frankly, I'm not interested in increases in torque or horsepower, unless it increases MPG.
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 10:59 AM
|
#10
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale
Posts: 1,219
M.O.C. #635
|
Glenn,
I am SHOCKED! Shocked, I say. Are you not the one who has always argued stock is best? Something about the manufactures would put it on if it were any good at all -- or some such. Did you have some kind of epiphany?
Respectfully curious,
Dave
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 12:29 PM
|
#11
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Salem
Posts: 7,550
M.O.C. #2283
|
There is some great reading on The diesel gargage forum. Click on 2005 LLY over heat problrms, then go to Main sorce of LLY heat. It is a great read for any of us with a diesel truck, especially those with a 2005 DMAX. Try it Glenn. Let us know what you think.
Lynwood
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 02:09 PM
|
#12
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,376
M.O.C. #6575
|
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by mlh
There is some great reading on The diesel gargage forum. Click on 2005 LLY over heat problrms, then go to Main sorce of LLY heat. It is a great read for any of us with a diesel truck, especially those with a 2005 DMAX. Try it Glenn. Let us know what you think.
Lynwood
|
The LLY engines are overheaters. No if, ands, or buts. I have never overheated mine, but I believe they will overheat. I am disappointed GM never acknowledged this fact. Given the right circumstances, any of them will overheat. The race for horsepower and torque simply left the cooling system no match for the heat the engine produced. If I were traveling a lot, I would have to add the extra cooling provided by the V2 cooling system. But, IIRC the site you mention is where KB hangs out; I would be cautious about his cures for overheating LLY engines.
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 02:44 PM
|
#13
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine
Posts: 1,445
M.O.C. #538
|
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by Dave e Victoria
Glenn,
I am SHOCKED! Shocked, I say. Are you not the one who has always argued stock is best? Something about the manufactures would put it on if it were any good at all -- or some such. Did you have some kind of epiphany?
Respectfully curious,
Dave
|
I bite my tongue on that too. g
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 03:41 PM
|
#14
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clearwater
Posts: 10,917
M.O.C. #420
|
Dave and bigmurf,
It's not like I messed with the computer by adding a chip or reprograming. It only makes sense that if you allow more and cooler air to the intake that an improvement will take place.
Years ago you took the air cleaner off those 4 barrels to add more air and improve performance. Worked than and should work today.
Will,
Try it Glenn. Let us know what you think."
No offense but I rarely read "The diesel gargage forum" or any of the diesel forums as I have absolutely no idea who all those so called diesel "experts" are in the real life. At one time I did read them all and soon found the same posters using different User IDs saying one thing on one forum and using a different ID totally contradicting himself on another forum. Seems some of them like having it both ways. I even recall one individual who had a Ford on one forum and a Dodge on another and if I tried a bit harder I probably would have found him with a GM on still another.
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 04:43 PM
|
#15
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine
Posts: 1,445
M.O.C. #538
|
What's next Glenn. A little diesel fuel additive? ggg
|
|
|
07-30-2008, 06:16 PM
|
#16
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clearwater
Posts: 10,917
M.O.C. #420
|
Not gonna happen.
Have never found the need for any additive in either of my Duramax's.
|
|
|
07-31-2008, 02:05 AM
|
#17
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,376
M.O.C. #6575
|
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by mlh
There is some great reading on The diesel gargage forum. Click on 2005 LLY over heat problrms, then go to Main sorce of LLY heat. It is a great read for any of us with a diesel truck, especially those with a 2005 DMAX. Try it Glenn. Let us know what you think.
Lynwood
|
Glenn, the quote you referenced to me was not my post. I asked you a couple questions about the Bank's filter.
|
|
|
07-31-2008, 04:27 AM
|
#18
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lobelville
Posts: 2,128
M.O.C. #6650
|
I bought a K&N filter back in 2005/2006 and wasn't impressed at all. Just to much dust gets in. I took it out and only use the OEM filter, and some of the reports I have read say OEM is better than the K&N because of oil. GBY....
|
|
|
07-31-2008, 05:12 AM
|
#19
|
Montana Fan
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Williamstown
Posts: 150
M.O.C. #6477
|
I remember someone here or on another diesel forum had an article about reusable filters. It was done by an oil (Amsoil or Rotella ?) company. They would run an engine for 5000 miles with different air filters on them and then check the oil for silicon content. None of the reusable high flow filters came close to stock paper filters for actual filering ability. Keeping in mind that a turbo charged diesel uses 7 times the volume of air as a naturally aspirated engine, I think this is significant. K&N flowed 4 times more air than stock but was near the bottom for filtering ability (around 87% I think). AFE was neer the top in filtering ability (around 96%) but only flowed twice as many cfm's than stock. Not sure if any of this helps, but it's obvious that it is a trade off that each will have to decide on. More power=less filteing. More filtering=less power. Probably what kind of conditions you normally drive in (dusty,etc.) will also make a big difference. I have an AFE7 from my 04 F250. It will fit on my 07 F350 but I have yet to decide whether to install it or not. Probably would get me a little better mpg's and a little more power, but I am not sure if it's worth the risk. Paper is definitely the saner choice, but there's nothing wrong with being a little nuts sometimes .
Edit: K&N flowed 400 cfm more than stock not 4 times more. AFE flowed 200 cfm more not 2 times more.
|
|
|
07-31-2008, 05:53 AM
|
#20
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Myers
Posts: 5,933
M.O.C. #4282
|
I think a properly maintained K & N filter - proper cleaning and proper re-oiling - would serve well if the truck is to be used strictly for towing the Montana on paved roads. If you plan on 2-tracking with it or if you have to drive any at all over any dirt or gravel roads, I would say that K & N would not be a good choice.
I am thinking of re-installing my K & N. We have a Park Ave that we use as a daily driver and the truck is used only to move the Montana or the boat, or as a 2nd vehicle occasionally. We never have it on any dirt roads.
I have had some minor overheating problems the last two times over that Jellico - Knoxville stretch of I-75. I think better airflow may help on that moderately difficult stretch. The problem is that if you are not going up, you are going down. Poor Allison has a hard time catching her breath...
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|