Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Montana Owners Club - Keystone Montana 5th Wheel Forum > MOC Technical Forums > Montana Problems, Problem Solving & Technical Help
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-03-2006, 05:49 AM   #21
drhowell
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Jones
Posts: 538
M.O.C. #3628
WOW! Just checked mine and it is one of the units covered by the recall! Called the Dometic recall line and left the information.

Thanks Rich!!!!!
 
drhowell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 06:40 AM   #22
campbud
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,502
M.O.C. #3142
I am going to check mine right now too!
campbud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 03:38 PM   #23
dsprik
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Myers
Posts: 5,933
M.O.C. #4282
Right model # (RM2862), wrong serial sequence (621...). I should be OK???

My daughter had a 93 Grand Am that blew a head gasket. Found out there was a recall. Serial # on her engine was JUST over the inclusive numbers of the recall. Still had the same problem at the exact mileage (100K) stated as the problem mileage in the recall notice.

So I'm a little concerned. I need to be better convinced... Phone call.
dsprik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 06:01 PM   #24
Garin1
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Morgan City
Posts: 642
M.O.C. #2773
This could be a very dangerous game Dometic is playing. Maybe waiting for the warranty's to run out before sending a notice??. Ford did that in 2000. They had a problem with the head gaskets on the 5.4 engines. The company issued a warning(dealers only)and if the gaskets failed before the 100000 mile warranty then Ford would bite the bullet,, but after,,,well you get the picture. noneck stated that the recall came out in August 06. Has anyone received a notice from Domitic or keystone about this,,? Not I.
Garin1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 11:49 PM   #25
Fordzilla
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Marcus
Posts: 1,032
M.O.C. #2819
Send a message via MSN to Fordzilla
All I have seen is the problem. I don't think Dometic even has the answer on how they are going to replace 962,877 heat exchangers. My dealer didn't have any clue about it yet. He didn't even know they were getting recalled. I told him about it ad he kept asking what i wanted him to do about it. Not very helpful! Glad I have the MOC to help me.
Fordzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 02:25 AM   #26
richfaa
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Ridgeville
Posts: 20,229
M.O.C. #2839
Well.I am glad I did catch it.. I sort of hesitated in posting it because I thought it might be old news.Strangely enough in the last couple of months I have read about Rv Fridges catching fire and actually saw one at the service center when at the Fall rally. I fifured posting it would not hurt....glad I did now..
richfaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 03:38 PM   #27
Okie Guy
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Olahoma City
Posts: 1,219
M.O.C. #6054
My 2005 Mountaineer has one of the recalled units. If you have one of the newer models you definately need to check your model and serial numbers.
I also called the information line and man that was a laugh. I just hope the information comes available sooner rather than later.
Happy Trails
Okie Phil
Okie Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 07:11 AM   #28
hazmic
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: cedar rapids
Posts: 703
M.O.C. #4962
I checked mine and I have dometic model RM2862 but the serial number that I have begins with 511 so I don't think mine is included. I will call them tomorrow to verify.
hazmic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2006, 02:08 PM   #29
trukdoc
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sulphur Springs
Posts: 748
M.O.C. #2220
Send a message via MSN to trukdoc
Thanks Richfaa!!!
I was getting around to checking my Ser# when we noticed the frige was not working, no sooner that we noticed that Nonnavigator called me in the field and said she could smell ammonia. I got home and there was yellow stain around the burner tube and evidence of a fire. Fortunately the fire did not ammount to enough to catch Rosie on fire. We are insured... but we are packed for a trip to California to visit Grandkids and Daughter for Christmas. There is plenty insurance would not be able to replace.
I contacted Dometic and no person contacted me just an automated response with instructions to contact a local service center. The local service center knew nothing of the NTSB recall.
One of the big dangers of fire is open flame, just a matter of hours before the failure there was a power outage from the high winds that came through here. Too close for comfort.
Folks get your units checked out, this is dangerous. And the more we file complaints with the NTSB the sooner we force some sort of action. I realize that 900K+ units is a huge problem for them... at the very least their service centers should be on top of what is going on. It is bad that the consumers are telling the dealers about the recall!!!
trukdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2006, 07:38 AM   #30
patodonn
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Full Timer
Posts: 918
M.O.C. #331
In reading the info, it appears that you have to have two things going on for a fire to result. first,you have to have a leaking boiler tube, and second, a fire could only result from that if the gas mode (gas flame) was being used. Looks like electrical (AC) operation would not result in a fire even if the boiler tube was leaking. Fridge might not work well with a leaking boiler tube, but that would be an indication to look for the problem.

I think I will run mine only on AC power until this all gets resolved. That means shutting it off while towing (an often discussed issue on the forum) and no camping w/o electricity. Inspection of the "outside" area of the fridge compartment now and again for evidence of leaking (fluid residue) should help in identifying the basic problem, if it occurs.



patodonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 03:48 PM   #31
noneck
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wappingers Falls
Posts: 1,303
M.O.C. #6263
Send a message via AIM to noneck
Did you all see this file? RCORRD-06E076-4726.pdf its been added to the site http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov
Chuck
noneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 05:27 PM   #32
patodonn
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Full Timer
Posts: 918
M.O.C. #331
Interesting document, and relieved a lot of my personal stress level re this situation. I'll stick to the precautions I mentioned in an earlier post on this thread.

Also, talked to a "knowledgeable individual" who indicated that the smell of ammonia would be very noticable to begin with, and also indicated that if the unit was in the AC mode, that would eliminate the possibility of ignition, even if there was a leak.

From the referenced document. it appears that no one has actually had the problem occur, no one has had a fire, and the Dometic "consultants" had to work really hard to figure out a scenario under which one could occur. (Rich...sound familiar?? 10 to the ?? power?)

Good info, but doesn't have me loosing any sleep over it..JMHO
patodonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 12:26 AM   #33
noneck
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wappingers Falls
Posts: 1,303
M.O.C. #6263
Send a message via AIM to noneck
Agreed, I came to the same conclusion...makes me interested in digging into the heater element cavity to see how its configured for heat transfer through Ammonia tubing loop. Its on my anti-honey-do list.
Chuck
noneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 12:29 PM   #34
jerryb
Montana Fan
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 219
M.O.C. #137
Has anyone gotten their "package" from Dometic?
I called my info in several weeks ago and the voicemail reply said they would send me a package with instructions, and that was several weeks ago.
jerryb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 03:12 AM   #35
drhowell
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Jones
Posts: 538
M.O.C. #3628
NOPE!
Nothing yet!
drhowell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 09:45 AM   #36
rldriver
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ephrata
Posts: 757
M.O.C. #2801
Looks like I am now on the list for a future package as my number came up on the list. Why does my number come up on the wrong lists?

One other thing that I noticed is that the original recall was dated August 28, 2006, so that means Dometic has not come up to the plate to fix this safety problem in close to 4 months and how many months before that did they realize there was a problem? It will be interesting to see how long they take. I would also like to see what changes they made after they found the problem, if any?
rldriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 11:41 AM   #37
jackel1959
Montana Master
 
jackel1959's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oak Harbor
Posts: 1,530
M.O.C. #2471
Dick and Jackie,
Here is the answer to your question:

In April of 1997 Dometic modified the design of the affected refrigerators by increasing the wattage of the heating element from 325 watts to 354 watts. All production of the affected units from April 1997 through May of 2003 utilized the 354 watt heating element. In May of 2003, in order to improve the operating life of the refrigerators, Dometic returned to the use of the 325 watt heating element which it continues to use today. It is now believed that the use of the higher wattage heater contributed to abnormal fatigue in the boiler tube.

This information is from one of the documents available at the NHTSA website. I imagine the fix for the affected units will be to replace the heating element.

__________________
Previous:2004 Mountaineer 325FKBS,2010 Montana 3455SA Now:2018 Bighorn 3575EL (SOB's ) Res. Fridge,W/D,Disc Brakes,Water Softener,Dish Tailgater PRO,LioN Batts, several mods.
2021 RAM 3500 Laramie...."LOADED", 4x4, SB H.O. 6.7L, Aisin Trans, PullRite Super Glide Hitch, 52 Gallon Titan Fuel Tank.
jackel1959 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 12:17 PM   #38
rldriver
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ephrata
Posts: 757
M.O.C. #2801
Thanks Jack very interesting, I guess we will just have to keep the fire extinguisher handy.
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by jackel1959

Dick and Jackie,
Here is the answer to your question:

In April of 1997 Dometic modified the design of the affected refrigerators by increasing the wattage of the heating element from 325 watts to 354 watts. All production of the affected units from April 1997 through May of 2003 utilized the 354 watt heating element. In May of 2003, in order to improve the operating life of the refrigerators, Dometic returned to the use of the 325 watt heating element which it continues to use today. It is now believed that the use of the higher wattage heater contributed to abnormal fatigue in the boiler tube.

This information is from one of the documents available at the NHTSA website. I imagine the fix for the affected units will be to replace the heating element.

rldriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 01:48 PM   #39
trukdoc
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sulphur Springs
Posts: 748
M.O.C. #2220
Send a message via MSN to trukdoc
I should be getting my Rosie back tomorrow with new frige coils.
trukdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 07:44 AM   #40
VanMan
Montana Master
 
VanMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Weatherford
Posts: 1,383
M.O.C. #9
Is the "boiler tube" the same as the "burner housing"? If not, it sounds like the proposed fix is inadequate. The remedy appears to be a "kit" to install an additional "secondary burner housing" in addition to the existing one. There is no mention of replacing the 354 watt element with the currently used 325 watt element, nor replacing or any remedy for an already "fatigued" boiler tube (unless that's really the "burner housing". The proposed fix sounds like it will only keep any leaking ammonia away from a flame - not prevent further fatigue nor failure of the refrigerator (ammonia leakage).
VanMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dometic Recall fix tonycamacho Montana Problems, Problem Solving & Technical Help 9 08-16-2009 06:23 PM
Dometic Fridge Recall (yet another) abrown134 Repairs & Service 5 10-18-2008 04:23 PM
Dometic Refrigerator Recall Mr.oddjobs General Discussions about our Montanas 3 10-17-2008 09:20 AM
Dometic recall stiles watson Repairs & Service 3 05-22-2007 02:54 PM
Dometic Fridge recall Montana Rog Montana Problems, Problem Solving & Technical Help 1 12-16-2006 05:14 PM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Montana RV, Keystone RV Company or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.