I think 'atomic clock' is not an accurate description. This is from the Wikipedia article talking about actual atomic clocks:
A
radio clock is a clock that automatically synchronizes itself by means of government radio
time signals received by a
radio receiver. Many retailers market radio clocks inaccurately as atomic clocks;
[118] although the radio signals they receive originate from atomic clocks, they are not atomic clocks themselves. Normal low cost consumer grade receivers solely rely on the amplitude-modulated time signals and use narrow band receivers (with 10 Hz bandwidth) with small ferrite
loopstick antennas and circuits with non optimal digital signal processing delay and can therefore only be expected to determine the beginning of a second with a practical accuracy uncertainty of ± 0.1 second. This is sufficient for radio controlled low cost consumer grade clocks and watches using standard-quality
quartz clocks for timekeeping between daily synchronization attempts, as they will be most accurate immediately after a successful synchronization and will become less accurate from that point forward until the next synchronization.
[119] Instrument grade time receivers provide higher accuracy. Such devices incur a transit delay of approximately 1
ms for every 300 kilometres (186 mi) of distance from the
radio transmitter. Many governments operate transmitters for time-keeping purposes.