|
08-11-2004, 09:45 AM
|
#1
|
Montana Fan
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: williamsport
Posts: 252
M.O.C. #680
|
everest overtaking montana
First of all ,we have a montana; but from the last trips we have made it looks like keystone is really pushing the everest line, have seen and been in quite a few of them, they are really quite nice and we like them better than the monty line, but no dealer in this area,i understand they are built at the elkhart plant, is montana starting to take a back seat in the keystone line now, the extra additions on the everest sure are nice and the price is right in line with the montana. Does anybody out there know if keystone is pushing this line harder, montana does have a decent rep. but not perfect.
|
|
|
08-11-2004, 09:54 AM
|
#2
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 3,430
M.O.C. #29
|
sgf,
I suspect it is just the nature of the market place. Seems that is always the way things go. Or maybe they got a "hot" new manager for that particular division. Since the Montana line has been so good for them I wouldn't think they'd deliberately try to downscale it. But marketing never was my strong suite. The nice thing about all this is that the consumer gets more good choices! It will be interesting to watch how this develops.
RVWheels
|
|
|
08-11-2004, 12:39 PM
|
#3
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 897
M.O.C. #1745
|
We recently went to a local state park and there were 4 Everests as we entered the park. We were the only Montana. From my understanding from several sources, the Everest has the little extras inside but is not necessarily as well built as the Montana. I know someone who has an Everest with a similar floor plan to mine and there is not really a lot of difference. They have a different closet setup with more drawers in the bedroom, but I like the nice long closet in our Montana. I guess it is another choice in the many choices out there.
|
|
|
08-11-2004, 06:58 PM
|
#4
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,740
M.O.C. #1757
|
Thanks for the posting. Something to look for in the future. Happyrving.....
|
|
|
08-17-2004, 04:34 PM
|
#5
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oceanside
Posts: 20,028
M.O.C. #20
|
sgf, we asked a Keystone rep the difference between Montana and Everest from their view. We were told the Everest uses a higher percentage of build budget for eye candy while the Montana puts more into build quality, such as attic vents to vent moisture, etc. I can't vouch for the accuracy but that's what we were told.
|
|
|
08-17-2004, 04:56 PM
|
#6
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flemington
Posts: 1,373
M.O.C. #242
|
Last weekend we had 5 Montana's in the campground and I did not even see an Everest on the road.
John
|
|
|
08-18-2004, 03:48 AM
|
#7
|
Seasoned Camper
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Birch Run
Posts: 78
M.O.C. #1106
|
Hi,
Last weekend we were upnorth in Michigan. On the way home we saw six Montana's on the road and no Everests. That is in an hour and a half trip.
|
|
|
08-18-2004, 04:00 PM
|
#8
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oceanside
Posts: 20,028
M.O.C. #20
|
The Everest has only been around a year or two so we probably won't see as many of them on the road for awhile. But I'm seeing more and more. They are very nice from appearance, inside and out, but in my opinion the Montana has the higher build quality and that's very important to me since we're putting a lot of miles on ours.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|