Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Montana Owners Club - Keystone Montana 5th Wheel Forum > GENERAL DISCUSSIONS > General Discussions about our Montanas
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-08-2013, 12:14 PM   #61
Tom S.
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford
Posts: 3,693
M.O.C. #7500
Grayghost, we used to have stamping presses in our plant that were held together with threaded rods that anywhere from 8" to 12" in diameter. It was impossible to torque them tight enough to stretch them the required amount with any kind of equipment we had, so per manufacturer's orders, they were heated with a torch until red hot, then a wrench hooked up to either a truck or a crane would tighten them down. When they cooled, they contracted, creating the needed torque. That was some serious torque stretch!
 
Tom S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 01:28 PM   #62
Irlpguy
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Chilliwack
Posts: 1,520
M.O.C. #12935
Quote:
quote:

Grandpachet wrote:

If there are torque specs of 45-70 i am not going to worry about the recommendation of weight on or off the ground. Checking the torque is important but with the variable numbers recommended it leaves a lot of room for discussion. How could weight on or weight off vary as much as the reommendated specs? Just my .02.
Definitely worth more than .02 Grandpachet, hopefully the vast majority would view this as you have. For those that were originally concerned about damage they might have caused and those that might not think about how illogical this is, then it would be nice to get a definitive answer from Dexter.

There is no need to be an engineer or see this from an engineering point of view, all that is important is those that for whatever reason might ask the question, we can say it either "makes insignificant difference" or "you would see xx lbs difference in doing it one way as opposed to the other".

If indeed there is "any" difference then for sure it will not be sufficient to put you outside the recommended range, especially if you set your torque at approximately the center of the range.

Although it is a PITA, my having to replace both my axles will give me the opportunity to check all this and to recheck the torque at a later date to see if there is any change. I will know what the torque was before my unit moves even one mile, and whether it makes any difference with wheels on or off the ground. Oh yes and I will be starting with all new U bolts.

Can't wait for everyone to arrive for work Monday morning at the Dexter Plant.

Irlpguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 05:26 AM   #63
richfaa
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Ridgeville
Posts: 20,229
M.O.C. #2839
I just made this post "I was a bit confused about the torque on the U bolt so I called Dexter and spoke to Glen who is the rep who is always at the Fall rally'

The 7 K axle uses a 1/2 U bolt and the nut size is 3/4.That is what confused me. Glen said The torque should be between 45 and 70 preferably toward the higher end .I mentioned I thought he said 60/65 at the rally and he said that was a good number.

NOW this is what I do NOT remember him saying..THE TORQUE READING SHOULD BE WITH THE WEIGHT OFF THE AXLE.WE SHOULD JACK THE RV OFF THE GROUND BY THE FRAME FOR THE READING TO BE ACCURATE. I did not have that note in my book from the seminar.

Now I am looking for sound engineering data on the subject. We have many post but no sound engineering data.If I had sound engineering data or could offer it I would never have done the post.

we will get the answer and we will have gained knowledge.
Found this today http://www.suspensionspecialists.com/tech0004.html#2

Note there is NOT a mention of tightening the U bolts with the wheels off the ground...You would think these folks would know HUMMMMMM
richfaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 06:11 PM   #64
Irlpguy
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Chilliwack
Posts: 1,520
M.O.C. #12935
Since I am just a layman, I cannot offer any "sound engineering data" but I can offer the following quotes from email responses I have received from Dexter, and to advise that the answer to the "BIG" question will officially be forthcoming.

1) Email from my contact at Dexter.
Quote:
quote:
Good Morning Ed,

Our Engineering department is working on your questions.

Thank you,
2) Email from Product Engineer to whom my questions were referred.

Quote:
quote:

Ed,
At this point in time Dexter doesn't have an approved published procedure.
Because of your inquiry Engineering will write a procedure and get it
approved for distribution. Not sure of the timing for completion.

Thank You
3)Second email from Product Engineer in response to my request for an answer to my question at this time.

Quote:
quote:

Ed,
Unofficially I would recommend that over slung axles be torqued loaded and
under slung axles be torqued unloaded. The reason the under slug is torqued
unloaded is that the vehicle weight is directly working on the tie plates.

I hope this answers your question
It appears Dexter will publish an approved procedure for torquing the U bolts on their axles sometime in the future. I have thanked them for doing this.

I would say it is herein confirmed as I and others have said, there is no weight on the U bolts on an over slung axle but there is on an under slung axle. Although our concern involves only the over slung axle with our Montana's, and not the under slung, therein may lie the possibility of engineering reasons for removing the weight from the U bolts and tie plates, ie: lifting the wheels off the ground.

I think we can all go to bed from now on with the knowledge that checking and re-torquing our U bolts does not require lifting the wheels off the ground.

Now that my new replacement axles have arrived, c/w new U bolts I am looking forward to being able to use my dream home again.


Irlpguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 03:54 AM   #65
steelpony5555
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Copperas Cove
Posts: 1,426
M.O.C. #12096
Anybody ever wonder what happens to the hundreds if not thousands of trailers sold to folks who know nothing or don't bother to check forums like this and are happily cruising the highways with their U-bolts straight from the factory.....hmmmmmmmm.... remember we are just a very minor group of owners compared to the number of rigs they have sold over the years.
steelpony5555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 03:59 AM   #66
simonsrf
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pagosa Springs
Posts: 3,711
M.O.C. #3120
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by steelpony5555

Anybody ever wonder what happens to the hundreds if not thousands of trailers sold to folks who know nothing or don't bother to check forums like this and are happily cruising the highways with their U-bolts straight from the factory.....hmmmmmmmm.... remember we are just a very minor group of owners compared to the number of rigs they have sold over the years.
Yep, I see at least one every day and wonder how they ever survived.
simonsrf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 05:43 AM   #67
richfaa
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Ridgeville
Posts: 20,229
M.O.C. #2839
Seven pages and we apparently have the correct answer and all I did was ask a question.. You know someone may have asked T.Edison " how come it is so dark in here.
richfaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 06:25 AM   #68
Irlpguy
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Chilliwack
Posts: 1,520
M.O.C. #12935
Absolutely nothing wrong with asking the question, however sometimes any of us will question the answer we have been given. I suspect that Thomas would have said "I am working on it, someday darkness will become light". Until then everyone carried on lighting their candles and kerosene lanterns, and the wheels did not fall off.

Steelpony5555, I suspect the vast majority of U bolts are fine from the factory with most being within the specs... We need to strike a balance in reporting things of possible concern to the MOC, otherwise we can cause unnecessary anxiety for some who rely on what is posted here. I hope Dexter will come through with a published procedure which will provide a ready reference to questions we might have regarding U bolts and other parts of their axle assembly.

Not performing regular maintenance and service keeps the repair people in business and we see it every day as was mentioned. I will be going with a young friend to retrieve his tent trailer because he did not check the wheel nuts and lost a wheel and subsequently broke off all 4 wheel studs. Hard to get those broken studs out on the side of the road so he is forced to replace the hub assy. Sometimes we have to learn from experience.
Irlpguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 07:22 AM   #69
Art-n-Marge
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Murrieta
Posts: 5,816
M.O.C. #9257
Send a message via MSN to Art-n-Marge Send a message via Yahoo to Art-n-Marge
Richfaa, two things. First, remember there is nothing wrong with questions since there is NO such thing as a stupid question. I have said in the past and will restate, there are sometimes some stupid answers and I think that dude gave you one that started these 7 pages of discussion.

The second thing is from what everyone has posted, I feel confident that with the range of torque specified for the nuts being from 45 to 70 (that's quite a swing), that achieving this torque with the wheels on the ground is suitable. I have been sleeping just fine several pages back and with a few more pages of posts, I can still enjoy a great night's sleep.

Richfaa, there was NOTHING wrong with your question and it sounds like some overzealous Dexter person talked too much without a good reason (gee, I've never done that). It happens and you can be congratulated on helping us realize that sometimes you should ask several people before deciding on the overall answer. It's kinda like the MOC, where I've posted a question and gotten a range of answers, and collectively I've arrived at THE answer and its conditions. Sometimes it's done in 1 page, sometimes it's 7. It has saved me hundreds of dollars.
Art-n-Marge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 08:13 AM   #70
richfaa
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Ridgeville
Posts: 20,229
M.O.C. #2839
Looking at my first post on the subject I was questioning the off the ground statement as I had not heard that in ANY of the Dexter seminars at the fall rally and we have been to 7 of them. Apparently it was the over slung and under slung issue that was miss communicated and many here suspected that.I myself was clueless. I will now go out and torque my lug nuts to 60lbs.
richfaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 04:27 AM   #71
robert285rld
Seasoned Camper
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 52
M.O.C. #11885
New tires installed - I requested the torgue on the u-bolts be checked and corrected. The results were what others have reported. All were found to be between 20 and 30 ft. pds. Manufacturers spec is 90 ft. Lbs. I feel much safer NOW !!!
robert285rld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 05:04 AM   #72
8.1al
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Benson
Posts: 3,121
M.O.C. #1658
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by robert285rld

New tires installed - I requested the torgue on the u-bolts be checked and corrected. The results were what others have reported. All were found to be between 20 and 30 ft. pds. Manufacturers spec is 90 ft. Lbs. I feel much safer NOW !!!
Where did you find a spec for 90 ft. lbs., I believed it to be 45-70
8.1al is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 05:53 AM   #73
bncinwv
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Winfield
Posts: 7,327
M.O.C. #6846
Beat me to it Charlie, overtorqued can actually be just as problematic as undertorqued since it can lead to u-bolt failure by shearing or twisting the bolt!
Bingo
bncinwv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 11:26 AM   #74
robert285rld
Seasoned Camper
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 52
M.O.C. #11885
Down loaded lippert components - trailer axle operation and service manual.
robert285rld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 11:44 AM   #75
BB_TX
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: McKinney
Posts: 7,167
M.O.C. #6433
Sprung Axle Torque Specifications

Axle size Axle Capacity Maximum ft.-lb.
U-Bolts 2k 25 ft. lb.
3.5k w/1/2" 50 ft. lb.
5.2k 65 ft. lb.
6-8k 90 ft. lb.

From page 13 of Lippert Trailer Axle Operation and Service Manual

Oops! Info all runs together. Can't figure out how to space the info into columns. But you can see it on the link.
__________________
Bill & Patricia
Riley, our Golden
2007 3075RL (recently sold, currently without)
BB_TX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 01:52 PM   #76
8.1al
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Benson
Posts: 3,121
M.O.C. #1658
Do you have Lippert axles with 9/16" u bolts? Dexter uses 1/2" and specifies 45-70 ft. lbs. Before using that 90 ft. lb number I would make sure I had 9/16 u bolts.
8.1al is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 02:00 PM   #77
DQDick
Site Team
 
DQDick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Wilsey
Posts: 18,799
M.O.C. #11455
I agree with Charlie and bingo. For Monty's, up till now, 70# has been the max.
__________________
Dick, Joyce, Diego, Picatso and Gustav
2017 3720 RL, and 2013 HC 343RL
Pullrite Hitch, IS, Disk Brakes, 3rd AC, Winegard Traveler, Bathroom door mod, Dometic 320, couch for desk swap, replaced chairs, sun screens, added awnings, etc.
DQDick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 02:23 PM   #78
robert285rld
Seasoned Camper
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 52
M.O.C. #11885
I have dexter axles and lippert frame. Are the springs normally attached by the axle manufacturer or by the frame supplier or by a third party? I will have to check the u-bolts diameter next week. Leaving on a 6 month trip in a week. Adjustment can be made very easily if required. Thanks for identfying the potential problem. This forum is great place to gain knowledge.
robert285rld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 03:01 PM   #79
BB_TX
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: McKinney
Posts: 7,167
M.O.C. #6433
OK, then. From the Dexter axle manual page 66.

1/2" U bolt 45 min - 70 max ft-lbs
9/16" U bolt 65 min - 95 max ft-lbs
__________________
Bill & Patricia
Riley, our Golden
2007 3075RL (recently sold, currently without)
BB_TX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 03:46 PM   #80
8.1al
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Benson
Posts: 3,121
M.O.C. #1658
It also says 5/8 100-120, what size are your bolts?
8.1al is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bolt Torque Question PackerFan Maintenance 9 03-23-2015 06:18 PM
Pin Box Bolt Torque WeBeFulltime Maintenance 8 06-23-2013 01:44 PM
Pin box bolt torque jliveit General Discussions about our Montanas 3 05-27-2011 01:42 PM
U-Bolt Torque on the axles Texas Firefighter General Discussions about our Montanas 9 03-30-2010 04:32 PM
Lug nut torque Ozz Tow Vehicles & Towing 3 10-20-2007 06:42 AM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Montana RV, Keystone RV Company or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.