Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Montana Owners Club - Keystone Montana 5th Wheel Forum > GENERAL DISCUSSIONS > Tow Vehicles & Towing
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-26-2015, 06:23 AM   #21
chris199
Montana Fan
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SE
Posts: 478
M.O.C. #17167
You are definitely way over payload. You have 120 lb to cover a full tank of gas, you, your wife, kids, stuff, etc. Recommend you confirm actual pin wgt.
 
chris199 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2015, 09:03 AM   #22
Hooker
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 908
M.O.C. #7915
Do the numbers...

- Cargo capacity is what is on the Tire and Loading Information sticker on the driver's door jam. It is to the nearest one pound.
- Actual tow capacity...GCWR minus the tow vehicle's actual weight when ready to tow.
Hooker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2015, 10:39 AM   #23
richfaa
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Ridgeville
Posts: 20,229
M.O.C. #2839
The key words are the tow vehicle's actual weight when ready to tow.
richfaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2015, 11:13 AM   #24
mlh
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Salem
Posts: 7,550
M.O.C. #2283
One thing you won't haft to worry about is getting caught in Virginia. An officer with the weight division of the state police told a friend they didn't worry about RVs we were small fry and they didn't check us. They had better things to do.
Lynwood
__________________
www.harrellsprec.com
Lynwood Harrell
323 RL HC 2008 F250
mlh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2015, 11:21 AM   #25
mlh
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Salem
Posts: 7,550
M.O.C. #2283
One thing you won't haft to worry about is getting caught in Virginia. An officer with the weight division of the state police told a friend they didn't worry about RVs we were small fry and they didn't check us. They had better things to do.
Lynwood
__________________
www.harrellsprec.com
Lynwood Harrell
323 RL HC 2008 F250
mlh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2015, 12:48 PM   #26
richfaa
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Ridgeville
Posts: 20,229
M.O.C. #2839
Nor does Ohio however you can be stopped for a safety inspection or get caught up in a safety inspection at a roadside rest, etc. Once you are being inspected everything is fair game including weight.
richfaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2015, 02:37 PM   #27
Artemus Gordon
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Redding
Posts: 1,421
M.O.C. #12339
Also weight laws of your state, do not exempt you from States you visit. Overweight is overweight. Today we saw a parked toy hauler at the Cottonwood Ca Northbound weigh station. Fairly common sight!
Artemus Gordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 02:32 AM   #28
pkbridges77
Montana Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Clermont
Posts: 289
M.O.C. #17920
Reasons we upgraded to a 1 ton DRW:
I wanted to be able to stop, not just go.
I know I will tend to overload with tools and supplies for the "just in case".
I want the pleasure of driving and visiting, not the hassle of knowing state laws or paranoia of inspections.
At some point we will change RVs and I don't want to go through the TV issue again.
My 2015 F250 in pristine condition and low miles retained a much higher value than waiting.
After extensive searching I was able to trade and upgrade for very little difference.
pkbridges77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 02:39 AM   #29
kozzy
Montana Fan
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Nokomis
Posts: 464
M.O.C. #18144
Thanks for all the info. Most of it was all stuff I knew, I guess I just needed to hear it again. I went to the scales and let that decide.
My rig is loaded to go, except for water, food, and clothes, camper weighed in at 13900. I was surprised. With the hitch in the back, I was already 200 lbs over the payload. I know airbags wont raise the capacity, but will help level it out. Assuming 500 lbs for passengers, and the gear that wasn't loaded, while I would still be within in the tow capacity, im about 1000 over the GCWR of the truck. So, I let the scales make the decision, tomorrow, I am going to order a new 3500 CTD. Ill be under all the numbers with that truck, and the new engine and tranny will be more than enough....plus im pretty sure ill get better MGS towing, and enjoy the ride much more than worrying about being on the edge, going up hills, etc...
__________________
Ed
2016 Montana 3950 BR
2004 Montana 3650 RK
2019 Ram 3500 SRW Laramie CTD 6.7
kozzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 02:43 AM   #30
kozzy
Montana Fan
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Nokomis
Posts: 464
M.O.C. #18144
and just an FYI for all, all RMS are J2708 standard for tow ratings now, I think all the big 3 are at this point, 2015 or 2016 model years I believe all the manufacturers are doing it now, Toyota was the first,. they started a few years back, but those are baby trucks HEHE
__________________
Ed
2016 Montana 3950 BR
2004 Montana 3650 RK
2019 Ram 3500 SRW Laramie CTD 6.7
kozzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 04:12 AM   #31
mlh
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Salem
Posts: 7,550
M.O.C. #2283
You will have a very nice truck and will not regret having the Diesel engine. If you haven't drove a new diesel a great big smile is going to come over your face the first time you hit the throttle.
Lynwood
__________________
www.harrellsprec.com
Lynwood Harrell
323 RL HC 2008 F250
mlh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 11:16 AM   #32
pkbridges77
Montana Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Clermont
Posts: 289
M.O.C. #17920
I feel your pain, kozzy, having done the same thing. But I also think that once you get that reconciled, you will be driving and towing with confidence that your vehicle is built to handle what you're hauling. I reconciled it by realizing this was more of a need than a want, as long as this was the lifestyle we were choosing. I think you will be quite pleased.
pkbridges77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 12:55 PM   #33
Dam Worker
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: West Richland
Posts: 1,253
M.O.C. #17164
Paul I am curios as to your dually's brake size compared to the SRW's, are the dualies now coming with larger brakes than the SRW one tons? If so then I would have to agree about being able to stop better. In my world I would like to use both a good engine brake and the trailer brakes and last but not least the TV's brakes. All of these combined should be the best braking possible. Even then I realize I cannot compete with the average car's braking ability. As for carrying to much and going over weight rating I agree with you. After rereading your post I see you used to have an F250 and can see why you switched to a bigger truck. Salesmen are always happy to tell you that your TV is just fine. Then they probably have you sign a wavier.

Tom Marty
__________________
Dam Worker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2015, 03:55 PM   #34
pkbridges77
Montana Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Clermont
Posts: 289
M.O.C. #17920
Tom, I can't claim any expertise on the physics of stopping a DRW vs a SRW. I believe the brake pads and rotors are identical, but the rear calipers are different on the two trucks. I think pads and rotors may be different on the Dodge and GM trucks - I know that Dodge advertises in their specs better stopping capability with DRW. I also have to presume there are some physics involved and stability with 6 tires vs 4. But my primary motivation was upgrading from a 250 to 350 for increased towing capacity and stability and believe the DRW will serve us better for the long term.
pkbridges77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2015, 10:26 AM   #35
Dam Worker
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: West Richland
Posts: 1,253
M.O.C. #17164
Paul I would think that in an emergency maneuver that the dually would be more stable than the SRW. Sounds like you have a very nice truck and I am sure that it is a big step up in capacity compared to the 3/4 ton. I have set aside 50 k for a new truck as the wife wants me to wait until I retire in 2020 to purchase it. I guess we will see if I can wait that long. Than I have to decide on the SRW verse DRW. My fiver is probably on the lighter end of the Montana models but you never know if we might upgrade. That is not the plan but I have noticed that plans have away of changing.
Enjoy that truck.

Tom Marty
__________________
Dam Worker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2015, 08:38 AM   #36
sambam
Montana Master
 
sambam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bridgewater
Posts: 1,196
M.O.C. #13166
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by kozzy

Thanks for all the info. Most of it was all stuff I knew, I guess I just needed to hear it again. I went to the scales and let that decide.
My rig is loaded to go, except for water, food, and clothes, camper weighed in at 13900. I was surprised. With the hitch in the back, I was already 200 lbs over the payload. I know airbags wont raise the capacity, but will help level it out. Assuming 500 lbs for passengers, and the gear that wasn't loaded, while I would still be within in the tow capacity, im about 1000 over the GCWR of the truck. So, I let the scales make the decision, tomorrow, I am going to order a new 3500 CTD. Ill be under all the numbers with that truck, and the new engine and tranny will be more than enough....plus im pretty sure ill get better MGS towing, and enjoy the ride much more than worrying about being on the edge, going up hills, etc...
Good decision. There is a lot to be said for comfortable, confident towing. White-knuckling through the mountains is nobody's idea of a good time. You are right. Your mpg will be much better than pulling that big Montana with a gasser. Best wishes with your new truck and 5th wheel.
__________________

2010 Montana 3455SA, Mor/Ryde pin, wet bolts, TST 507, Progressive HW50C, GY G614
2019 Silverado D/A 3500HD LTZ DRW CC
B&W Companion
sambam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2016, 07:18 AM   #37
kozzy
Montana Fan
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Nokomis
Posts: 464
M.O.C. #18144
Yeah, I had a few diesels in the past, and boy do I miss them, was tough to justify the cost without the need, but now that I have the need again, I'm very excited to get back into one. listening to that turbo wind up when you hit the pedal....SWEET....
__________________
Ed
2016 Montana 3950 BR
2004 Montana 3650 RK
2019 Ram 3500 SRW Laramie CTD 6.7
kozzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wow...that was close!! chris199 Repairs & Service 11 12-14-2016 10:35 AM
Who's close to us? osgoor General Discussions about our Montanas 16 07-11-2012 12:59 AM
Towing Problem or Normal Towing??? TheJeep Tow Vehicles & Towing 21 05-02-2011 02:28 AM
Getting Close Jay Bird Member News 4 04-08-2007 10:11 PM
The Day is Close Chester General Discussions about our Montanas 14 04-08-2005 10:04 AM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Montana RV, Keystone RV Company or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.