In our previous life, working in the Aviation industry (FAA Electronic systems) We purchased a system designed to meet our needs and operate under pre determined conditions. We the evaluated the system for a period of time, in this case 1 year determined by the Keystone warranty. During that time we made several system corrections or upgrades.We called them "system patches) in our industry and they are considered a normal thing to do.We have and are evaluating and recording results on the Montana based on how it meets our needs and our expectations.We have a April 16th appointment at the Service Center where the issues recorded will be corrected and our evaluations discussed.There is then the determination of can we correct or upgrade the present system to meet our needs or is there something more suitable..that we can afford... It is not a arbitrary decision.It is based on fact and performance of the product.Data will tell us what we need to do. Understand the evaluation must be conducted under the conditions that WE use OUR Montana.Only under those conditions are the results valid... Design, Implementation, data collection/evaluation and solutions with viable alternatives..will always work. Of course there is always "Murphy's law"
