|
|
02-06-2013, 04:23 PM
|
#21
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,284
M.O.C. #11675
|
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by Tom S.
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by oldelmer1
All the info above is true, but don't forget the macho look of the DRW too. )
|
Since when have training wheels looked macho?
|
LOL - Good one! I always thought they were just really expensive curb feelers.
|
|
|
02-09-2013, 03:05 PM
|
#22
|
Montana Fan
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Redmond
Posts: 274
M.O.C. #12815
|
We have a 2012 3500SRW and it does great pulling our 2012 3625RE Big Sky!!!!
|
|
|
02-09-2013, 10:37 PM
|
#23
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Shore
Posts: 6,009
M.O.C. #7110
|
I have never towed the fifth wheel with a single rear wheel. However, I have towed trailers with a single wheel before the purchase of a dually. In pulling a trailer there is no comparison IMHO as to better stability. My choice for towing is the dually. But as mentioned we should do the numbers for weight capacity.
I don’t get intimidated by the width of the dually either. I go through drive thru’s that are sometimes tight but I keep this in mind. I’ve not seen any fenders in the back that stick out more than what the mirrors do. I go slowly and IMO if the mirrors clear the back fenders should clear. I don’t cut corners but sometimes I have to re-adjust on sharp corner turns. You do have to give a little with the dual’s. It’s not always as convenient but I’ll take the dually even for a daily driver.
Also as mentioned, with me it becomes second habit to park away from the crowd. What does it hurt if you have to walk the length of a parking lot to get inside of a Wal-Mart? Unless you ride one of their carts you’re going to be walking quite a bit once you get inside anyway.
__________________
2011 GMC 4X4 dually CC, 6.6 Duramax with Allison Transmission. Formally 2001 Montana,2007 3400RL Montana, presently 2018 3401RS Alpine.
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 02:51 AM
|
#24
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Ridgeville
Posts: 20,229
M.O.C. #2839
|
I did not just buy a dually because they look good..IMO they do not. Using information we had and information from this forum and unders tanding that pin weight is a term few salewsman know or understand not to mention RV owners. We found that in crunching the number we needed the dually to handle pin weight so we got one.We do not enjoy driving this thing around without the RV attached.It is a PIA.When I have to drive this thing to work at Disney I have to park in a out of the way parking lot way in the back and take up nearly two spots. It is a must have for towing the heavy Montana's and bummer for daily driving.Just My Opinion.
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 07:58 AM
|
#25
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 908
M.O.C. #7915
|
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by richfaa
I did not just buy a dually because they look good..IMO they do not. Using information we had and information from this forum and unders tanding that pin weight is a term few salewsman know or understand not to mention RV owners. We found that in crunching the number we needed the dually to handle pin weight so we got one.We do not enjoy driving this thing around without the RV attached.It is a PIA.When I have to drive this thing to work at Disney I have to park in a out of the way parking lot way in the back and take up nearly two spots. It is a must have for towing the heavy Montana's and bummer for daily driving.Just My Opinion.
|
That about sums it up. We got our dually for exactly the same reason...the numbers said we needed one. One thing we love about the MH is our run around vehicle is now a Honda CRV...small, agile, reliable, good on gas.
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 10:07 AM
|
#26
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,284
M.O.C. #11675
|
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by richfaa
I did not just buy a dually because they look good..IMO they do not. Using information we had and information from this forum and unders tanding that pin weight is a term few salewsman know or understand not to mention RV owners. We found that in crunching the number we needed the dually to handle pin weight so we got one.We do not enjoy driving this thing around without the RV attached.It is a PIA.When I have to drive this thing to work at Disney I have to park in a out of the way parking lot way in the back and take up nearly two spots. It is a must have for towing the heavy Montana's and bummer for daily driving.Just My Opinion.
|
Couldn't agree more. This is why to me the dually is the only option. Pick the trailer FIRST, then that will tell you what you need to tow it...
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 11:07 AM
|
#27
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Washington Coast
Posts: 2,688
M.O.C. #10696
|
Gotta agree with the PITA to drive around town I'm a truck driver so driving big trucks is no big deal to me and alot of people say they are no more of a PITA than a SRW I'm saying they Are! I feel like I'm back at work again, MY OLD f350 SRW was fine around town My new Dually Chevy with it's Big Butt SUCKS around town but having said that I am glad I bought it Tows my 5th great
__________________
[
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 01:11 PM
|
#28
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sioux Falls
Posts: 664
M.O.C. #10985
|
I have a 2011 F-350 4X4 SRW. It handles the 2008 3450 which is 37' long and the motorcycle trailer with 2008 harley Ultra just fine. I do not experiance any unusual sway of any kind. Wind from a passing semi only inches away will move any vehicle. My Ford dealer told me Ford had substancially upgraded their suspension and I would not need a dually. I am glead I listened to him. But if you insist on burning 6 tires instead of 4 when you say the truck will be used daily, then go for it. They do look macho.
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 01:13 PM
|
#29
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: South
Posts: 2,499
M.O.C. #5140
|
For most of the reasons stated here, we also have a dually. And like Rich paraphrased, we can all use the walk from the parking lot to the Walmart...
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 03:02 PM
|
#30
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Washington Coast
Posts: 2,688
M.O.C. #10696
|
Unless you have a disability like me and can't walk too far it is a bummer trying to get into a handicap spot with the "BEAST"
__________________
[
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 04:28 PM
|
#31
|
Montana Fan
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 431
M.O.C. #11342
|
When we bought our truck, one of the salesmen pointed out the differences in E rated tire weight ratings. He suggested that when choosing single wheel over dually to look for 3750 pound rated tires. The 20 inch wheels on our '09 F250 4x4 have goodyear wranglers rated at 3750 lb..
I'm not sure of the equipment difference, but an F350 single wheel has a higher payload than a F250. I read somewhere that the axle housing on the F350 matched the DRW axle and had greater wall thickness.
|
|
|
02-10-2013, 07:50 PM
|
#32
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,284
M.O.C. #11675
|
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by shovelhead86
I have a 2011 F-350 4X4 SRW. It handles the 2008 3450 which is 37' long and the motorcycle trailer with 2008 harley Ultra just fine. I do not experiance any unusual sway of any kind. Wind from a passing semi only inches away will move any vehicle. My Ford dealer told me Ford had substancially upgraded their suspension and I would not need a dually. I am glead I listened to him. But if you insist on burning 6 tires instead of 4 when you say the truck will be used daily, then go for it. They do look macho.
|
Just be careful with your payload (pin weight and all the goodies). When I got my DRW I also got the camper certificate (allowable payload) and after pin weight, I have less than a thousand pounds for hitch, fuel, passengers, etc. Long story short, the DRW is just able to tow the Montana legally and safely and it's payload is much higher than a SRW.
|
|
|
02-11-2013, 12:55 AM
|
#33
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mendon
Posts: 9
M.O.C. #12533
|
I can't speak from experience driving a dually in tow, but I've been towing our 5th wheel for 8 yrs now and feel very comfortable driving during tow and especially local driving.
Two main reasons I didn't go dually was: 1- worrying about taking out the fenders in a toll both or other obstruction (with or without the wife driving the rig); and 2- I would have to sacriface 500 lbs tow weigh with a dually. I've talked with many campers and I came to the conclusion it's pretty much personal preference.
My work truck is a dually. The cost of tires, checking air pressure & adding air is a hassel. I installed the extention air hoses and my tire guy advised me they loose presure from the constant movement and he also said that many times when one of the tire blows the friction from the blown tire wears the side wall of the good tire.
For my next truck I'm not ruling out a dually since we'll be on the road most of the time in the future.
|
|
|
02-11-2013, 03:47 AM
|
#34
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Ridgeville
Posts: 20,229
M.O.C. #2839
|
Pin weight,,,,Pin weight.That is the difference between the two.Pulling is not the issue.....Pin weight....pin weight.
|
|
|
02-11-2013, 03:59 AM
|
#35
|
Montana Fan
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Afton
Posts: 166
M.O.C. #9256
|
I didn't want to mess with worrying about pin weight , so I got the dually this time. It's my first one and it won't be the last!
|
|
|
02-11-2013, 06:32 AM
|
#36
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 908
M.O.C. #7915
|
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by richfaa
Pin weight,,,,Pin weight.That is the difference between the two.Pulling is not the issue.....Pin weight....pin weight.
|
Been saying that for years, and I really get tired of the "it pulls fine" posts.
|
|
|
02-11-2013, 06:42 AM
|
#37
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,284
M.O.C. #11675
|
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by Hooker
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by richfaa
Pin weight,,,,Pin weight.That is the difference between the two.Pulling is not the issue.....Pin weight....pin weight.
|
Been saying that for years, and I really get tired of the "it pulls fine" posts.
|
The bad thing too is folks listen to and trust the truck salesman who probably never has towed in his life. He is also going to try to sell you the SRW on his lot because he doesn't have any DRWs - so of course he's going to say the SRW is fine!! We have some good mantras going here - Rich "pin weight, pin weight" and I like "trailer first, which dictates truck". Actually even if I had a lighter fifth wheel I'd still get the DRW just for the added stability. There is no such thing when towing as being TOO safe!
|
|
|
02-11-2013, 11:11 AM
|
#38
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sebring
Posts: 3,658
M.O.C. #9969
|
Another number that folks like to ignore is the TVs GVWR (weight of TV plus pin weight). Now depending on state and how they license trucks, that GVWR may be the max you can register the TV as, thus if ever checked would be the number they'ld use. NY is that way, so our GVWR on a 2011 GM 3500 Dually, Extended Cab, Long Bed, Diesel is 13000 and CAT Scaled with everthing loaded for travel came in at 12500, so we still have a little wiggle room.
__________________
Michelle & Ann
2018 Chevy 3500HD High Country DRW 4X4 Crew Cab w/Duramax/Allison, Formally 2010 Montana 2955RL, Now Loaded 2016 SOB, Mor/ryde IS, Disc Brakes & Pin Box, Comfort Ride Hitch, Sailun 17.5 Tires.
|
|
|
02-11-2013, 01:33 PM
|
#39
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Ridgeville
Posts: 20,229
M.O.C. #2839
|
here is how it works. The GVWR of my Ford Truck is 13,000 lbs. The Carry capacty is 4268lbs.The truck weighs 9200lbs ready to tow.
13,000lbs less 9200lbs =3800lbs which is the REAL carry capacity of the truck. The last weighed pin weight of the Rv was 2960lbs'.
3800 lbs less 2960lbs=840 lbs leeway..with the dually. Use your numbers with a Single wheel truck and see what you get.
Of course a single wheel drive truck will pull it fine ..it has the same drivetrain...but NOt the same carry capacity.
|
|
|
02-12-2013, 04:50 AM
|
#40
|
Montana Master
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Wylie
Posts: 532
M.O.C. #9139
|
Know your weights. While it is extremely rare for a RV to be red tagged or taken out of service because of weight it does happen. I personally have a friend (not a friend of a friend) in LE who works commercial vehicle enforcement. He has personally taken RVs out of service. He will admit it is very rare but does happen. He says that RV weights are on the radar, especially now with licensing becoming a issue. A 16k# trailer and 10k# truck put you at the magic 26k#. In Texas if you exceed 26k# you must upgrade your license. He says there are an alarming number of RV owners operating their RV with a out of class license. With the higher weight capacities in most trucks today it is easy to exceed 26k#. (Keep in mind if you are legally registered & licensed in your state of residency you are legal in all states -- non-commercial). So if you are illegal in your home state you can be put out of service in another state. With internet access in his vehicle it is real easy to check another states licensing requirements.
It only takes a few high profile incidents for the states to start to put a priority on this. Look at the whole gun control debate that is currently going on. With the recent high profile incidents that have happened this would not be the ongoing discussion that it currently is. (Gun Control is just an example. Not arguing for or against)
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|