Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 

Go Back   Montana Owners Club - Keystone Montana 5th Wheel Forum > GENERAL DISCUSSIONS > Tow Vehicles & Towing
Click Here to Login

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-30-2013, 10:12 AM   #21
Phil P
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Okeechobee
Posts: 2,150
M.O.C. #11206
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by BB_TX

The OP's question was about the brakes on an F250 vs an F350, not anything about a dually.
If you look at this Ford web site you will see that they spec the rotors on the F250 and F350 as being the same size, including the DRW. The F450 has larger rotors.
And if you look at napa web site you will see that they give the same part numbers for replacement pads for both the F250 and F350.
That pretty much confirms that there is no difference in the brakes between the two, at least for 2012 Ford.
Did you check the booster? Are they the same?

Phil P
 
__________________
2009 Montana 3665RE
2009 Duramax 3500 DRW quad cab
personal web page https://www.sallyscoffees.com
If you get a page not available then remove the "s" after HTTP
Phil P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 10:20 AM   #22
Phil P
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Okeechobee
Posts: 2,150
M.O.C. #11206
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by DQDick

Normally true, but mine uses the same ones.
Chrysler uses a large hydro boost to improve the braking check that part number. They also use a larger accumulator on both the 3/4 and 1 ton than GM does that’s a real plus to me. You will get 2 brake applications where the GM will only get one in the event of a hydraulic pump failure.


Phil
__________________
2009 Montana 3665RE
2009 Duramax 3500 DRW quad cab
personal web page https://www.sallyscoffees.com
If you get a page not available then remove the "s" after HTTP
Phil P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 10:34 AM   #23
tanner1070
Montana Fan
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Palmdale
Posts: 177
M.O.C. #11365
Just bought a 2013 GMC 1 ton a few months ago. Had the same question. The only thing I could decern in my research was that the 1 ton has overload springs and the 3/4 ton didn't. Even the weight difference bore this out. Only being 62 lbs heavier than a 3/4 ton. Everything else I could tell was exactly the same. Not sure about other brands.
tanner1070 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 01:41 PM   #24
DonandBonnie
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Madison
Posts: 1,239
M.O.C. #5906
Five years ago when we first started to put our full timing plan together, we talked to a Chevy truck guru who was a pro at matching the proper truck to the load. He said that a 3/4 ton would take a Montana almost anywhere you wanted to go. It would bog down on steep hills and watching the weight was critical to avoid overloading the truck. He also said that a 1 ton was a slight overkill, but we would never have to worry about where we were going or the load as it relates to hauling capacity. We opted for the 1 ton and have never regretted it. We are not opposed to the dually we purchased, but when it comes time to replace the truck, we will have to think hard whether we really want a dual rear axle.
DonandBonnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 03:55 PM   #25
richfaa
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Ridgeville
Posts: 20,229
M.O.C. #2839
If the newer one ton single wheel trucks have the carry capacity for our Montana we would go with the Single wheel. If not it has got to be the dually. It is not a matter of do I like it is matter of we need it.
richfaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 04:16 PM   #26
bncinwv
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Winfield
Posts: 7,327
M.O.C. #6846
The only thing that really puzzles me about all of these conversations about trucks is the constant references to the braking ability. If you are relying on the truck to brake the rig, something is amiss. If the rig's brakes are properly adjusted and the brake controller is properly adjusted, the argument about whether the truck will stop the load is not a valid one in my opinion! I would think if you are relying on the truck to stop the hauled combination that very easily could approach eight tons, you are setting yourself up for a jack-knife situation. The rig should be adjusted so that the brakes complement the braking ability of the truck and BOTH should brake as evenly as physically possible. Would someone please explain to me where this argument is not valid, and particularly in an emergency braking situation. We chose the dually simply because of the weight capabilities, the braking power of the truck did not figure into the equation. Comments and clarification of my thoughts whether to agree or disagree are welcome (as always)! And I did not mention the weight capabilities so I am proud of myself!!
Bingo
__________________

Bingo and Cathy - Our adventures begin in the hills of WV. We are blessed by our 2014 3850FL Big Sky (previous 2011 3750FL and 2007 3400RL) that we pull with a 2007 Chevy Silverado Classic DRW CC dually.
bncinwv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 11:14 PM   #27
Phil P
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Okeechobee
Posts: 2,150
M.O.C. #11206
Hi

If you can’t apply full brake power to the trailer at 5 mph on dry pavement and slide the wheels then the braking system on the trailer is marginal.

At 88,000 lbs and 18 wheels if I pull the trailer brake handle without using the tractor brakes all wheels on the trailer will lock. This is a proper braking system.

Equipment trailers with duel wheels and tandem axels with electric brakes will lock the wheels when I use my electric controller without using the TV brakes. This is a proper breaking system.

The braking systems on the average 5th wheel RV is a marginal system.

Like richfaa says a little overkill on the TV would be desirable.

My wife and I have been driving lager vehicles so long we don’t have a problem with the places you have to avoid because of the wide TV.

Phil P
__________________
2009 Montana 3665RE
2009 Duramax 3500 DRW quad cab
personal web page https://www.sallyscoffees.com
If you get a page not available then remove the "s" after HTTP
Phil P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 01:12 AM   #28
Mudchief
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Paola
Posts: 5,739
M.O.C. #4961
Bingo, I agree with you.
__________________
Dennis & Linda Ward
Paola, Kansas
Montana 3735MK Legacy Edition
1200 watts of Solar
Mudchief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 01:43 AM   #29
pineranch
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Navarre
Posts: 1,527
M.O.C. #9765
Good point on brakes Bingo. Why not close out the new year with how you REALLY feel about truck ratings!!!
Mike
pineranch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 04:01 AM   #30
bncinwv
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Winfield
Posts: 7,327
M.O.C. #6846
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by Phil P

Hi

If you can�t apply full brake power to the trailer at 5 mph on dry pavement and slide the wheels then the braking system on the trailer is marginal.

At 88,000 lbs and 18 wheels if I pull the trailer brake handle without using the tractor brakes all wheels on the trailer will lock. This is a proper braking system.



Phil P
That is not the way my Prodigy instruction manual states the trailer should be set up for proper brake operation. I thought the brake controller was supposed to be set to the point just before brake lockup? Not being argumentative, but I think each person should be aware of what their system set-up recommendations are.

Bingo
bncinwv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 04:02 AM   #31
Hooker
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 908
M.O.C. #7915
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by Mudchief

Bingo, I agree with you.
Me too.
Hooker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 04:03 AM   #32
davidaf
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Aguanga
Posts: 606
M.O.C. #13601
Why do I want the largest brakes? Maybe it's a false sense of security when towing or a true sense of security when running around with a 4000lb payload. The only auxiliary braking my truck camper has are those four jack stands which wouldn't hold up well if deployed.
davidaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 07:22 AM   #33
Rondo
Site Team
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 6,750
M.O.C. #7560
I went from a 3/4 tone to a 1 ton this last change of TVs. It is the exact same TV except for a little heavier braking system and also the extra two leaf springs on the rear axle. The motor and transmission are also the same as the 3/4 ton. The ride is a bit more stiff but aside from that there is no difference. Oh, by the way, I have a 2012 Chevy 3500HD and had a 2007 1/2 Chevy 2500HD.
Rondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 09:58 AM   #34
Phil P
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Okeechobee
Posts: 2,150
M.O.C. #11206
Bingo

Nowhere in that post did I say the controller was to be set so the brakes lock. The first line tells you what the conditions are for the rest of the post.

I agree that the controller should be set so the brakes apply to the point just before they lock.

However the brakes on most 5th wheel RV’s will not lock the brakes on dry pavement regardless of where you set the controller. The trailer brakes are supposed to be of the sizes to lock the wheels when the full 12V is applied to them. Properly equipped trailers do lock the brakes when full 12v power is applied and then you set your controller so you don’t slide them on a panic stop. How do you determine where this is if your trailer brakes will not slide the wheels on dry pavement. You use a gravel road or pavement with sand on it. Doing it this way only proves the brakes are marginal. Dexter told me the brakes are marginal when I talked to them.

The brakes work they are just marginal and because they are marginal you should sizes your TV accordingly.

Phil P
__________________
2009 Montana 3665RE
2009 Duramax 3500 DRW quad cab
personal web page https://www.sallyscoffees.com
If you get a page not available then remove the "s" after HTTP
Phil P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 10:21 AM   #35
bncinwv
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Winfield
Posts: 7,327
M.O.C. #6846
Maybe I read it wrong, just want to make sure that others who may also read it wrong realize that the proper way to set up the brake controller is to not lock up the tires. I guess we will have to agree to disagree on the truck size selection being based on braking, that was not a factor since I chose and purchased our truck before I bought our first fifth wheel.
Bingo
bncinwv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 01:14 PM   #36
bethandkevin
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Davison
Posts: 786
M.O.C. #12331
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by bncinwv

The only thing that really puzzles me about all of these conversations about trucks is the constant references to the braking ability. If you are relying on the truck to brake the rig, something is amiss. If the rig's brakes are properly adjusted and the brake controller is properly adjusted, the argument about whether the truck will stop the load is not a valid one in my opinion! I would think if you are relying on the truck to stop the hauled combination that very easily could approach eight tons, you are setting yourself up for a jack-knife situation. The rig should be adjusted so that the brakes complement the braking ability of the truck and BOTH should brake as evenly as physically possible. Would someone please explain to me where this argument is not valid, and particularly in an emergency braking situation. We chose the dually simply because of the weight capabilities, the braking power of the truck did not figure into the equation. Comments and clarification of my thoughts whether to agree or disagree are welcome (as always)! And I did not mention the weight capabilities so I am proud of myself!!
Bingo
x2
Anyone, and I mean anyone who thinks they can "control" a 15,000 lb trailer with an 8,000 lb tow vehicle in a panic stop situation is woefully mistaken. JMHO
There, I said what I've thought every time this subject comes up.
bethandkevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 02:08 PM   #37
jlb27537
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Depends on temps
Posts: 1,648
M.O.C. #13157
The OP asked about brakes. A 2500/3500 the same year will have the same size brakes. Late model trucks have limited rear axle ratios on SRW trucks.

Your trailer should have brakes capable of stopping it's total weight.

A set of 6K axles on a trailer weighing 14+K needs larger brakes.

Your truck should be capable of carrying the weight of it's self and any loaded weight and not exceed either axle rating or the vehicles GVWR.

Your choice as to what truck you need. The SRW guys will say their truck is plenty, the rest of us like our DRW trucks.

Jim
__________________

2012 Ram Laramie 3500 DRW 4x4 3.73 Tow Max Pkg B&W Companion 60 gal RDS aux fuel tank. 2014 Montana 3150RL, 2 A/C's, Leather, 6 Point Jacks, Splendede WD2100XC, Mor/ryde X-Factor, Duravis 250 tires with TST 507RV monitors. 2 x Honda EU2000's
jlb27537 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 07:29 PM   #38
dsprik
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Myers
Posts: 5,933
M.O.C. #4282
My 2013 GMC 3500 SRW max trailers 17,000 lbs of 5th wheel... Who only has 8,000?
dsprik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 11:31 PM   #39
Phil P
Montana Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Okeechobee
Posts: 2,150
M.O.C. #11206
Hi Bingo

Many years ago when I was 20 I went to Lubbock Texas to a private training facility to obtain federal rating that I couldn’t use until after I was 21.

During this time I worked for the local Ford dealer as a line mechanic. At that time Texas had a vehicle inspection requirement. They used this requirement in two ways. One was to inspect the vehicle and the other was to certify the mechanic.

I obtained the inspection authorization by passing the Texas written test.

Now we did a brake test on all vehicles once a year. The test was conducted by using an accelerometer that was hung from the top of one of the side windows. You accelerated to a given speed (it was 50 years ago so I don’t remember the speed) and then applied the brakes to a stop. The accelerometer would indicate the rate of deceleration. It was not necessary to “lock” the wheels to pass this test.

The requirement for the braking system on any vehicle is still a deceleration in a given distance from a given speed and doesn’t involve the “locking” of the wheels.

You point that “locking” the wheels is not the object is well take and not disputed.

However in the absence of equipment to determine the deceleration of the unit the other way to determine your brakes are “marginal” or not is to “lock” the wheels while not using the TV brakes. If you are unable to do this then it indicates one of two things. Either the trailer is overloaded or the braking system is “marginal” in that it just passes the testing required by the regulations under which the axels were manufactured.

I don’t propose the idea that Dexter or any other manufacturer is producing and axel rated at a given weight capacity to be installing brakes that don’t meet the deceleration requirement.

The post was to indicate that every commercial vehicle I have driven pulling a trailer regardless of type of brake had brakes on the trailer that would “lock” the wheels at full weight on dry pavement and the average 5th wheel trailer will not “lock” the wheels at any weight on dry pavement while not using the TV brakes (applying the trailer brakes by hand).

Your selection of a TV was performed in the same way I did mine.

If you TV's GCW rating is at or below your weight then your braking system will be acceptable.

My wife and I decided on the TV that would pull a trailer of those sizes. We purchased a trailer that is rated a little over the size the truck is rated for. That is why I weigh so often to make sure I haven’t exceeded any of the published ratings for the TV or the trailer and I keep the weight ticket with the trailer. I don’t want to spend the rest of my life in prison because some idiot pulled in front of me and I ran them over.

Phil P
__________________
2009 Montana 3665RE
2009 Duramax 3500 DRW quad cab
personal web page https://www.sallyscoffees.com
If you get a page not available then remove the "s" after HTTP
Phil P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 03:12 AM   #40
mhs4771
Montana Master
 
mhs4771's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sebring
Posts: 3,657
M.O.C. #9969
Well if we look at Brake Technology, the electric Brakes on most Trailers has not changed since the beginning of time other than the change from 6 Volts to 12, while the weight and size has continued to go up and up.
For me with any of the bigger/heavier rigs, the only brakes I'll accept are Disc. Did the upgrade to our Monty and a world of difference, so it was a must when ordering our SOB. Now I'll admit if we were to have a brake failure on our SOB we'd need plenty of space to bring everything to a stop, but on the other side of the coin, the built-in exhaust brake does a wonderful job of slowing the entire setup down so little braking effort is required.
My experience and I'm sticking to it.
__________________
Michelle & Ann
2018 Chevy 3500HD High Country DRW 4X4 Crew Cab w/Duramax/Allison, Formally 2010 Montana 2955RL, Now Loaded 2016 SOB, Mor/ryde IS, Disc Brakes & Pin Box, Comfort Ride Hitch, Sailun 17.5 Tires.
mhs4771 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JT versus SteadyFast Art-n-Marge General Discussions about our Montanas 22 01-25-2010 07:51 PM
New Versus Used RV jaleepadgett General Discussions about our Montanas 16 12-12-2008 08:28 AM
50 amp versus 30 amp syplace Montana Problems, Problem Solving & Technical Help 24 06-17-2006 06:38 PM
30 versus 50 amp? dannyl Montana Problems, Problem Solving & Technical Help 3 09-08-2005 07:56 AM
2 x 4 versus 4 x 4 kbr278 Tow Vehicles & Towing 12 05-19-2005 02:52 PM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Montana RV, Keystone RV Company or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.