View Single Post
Old 01-03-2010, 11:45 AM   #17
Leaseit
Montana Fan
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lawrenceville
Posts: 279
M.O.C. #5356
Phil, you are right on and i agree with you totally. I was thinking the Mor-Ryde people and engineers must have seen something that was either wrong, missing, doubtful, questionable, better design or just did not give them a "Warm Feeling". Now having said that, i believe if i were the Lippert folks, i would be asking myself why another company is making something that i should be putting on the product to begin with to improve my product.
I agree that if the Mor-Ryde "Think Tank" (product development) saw a nitch in a exsiting product where they can make money and employ people, then sure as heck do it. It drops to the bottom line in these changing times.
My curiosity was why didn't or dosen't Lippert see this as an improvement area for their current product. The thing is, does this fall into a product improvement by Mor-Ryde or Lippert product deficiency.
Sorry, didn't mean to get confusing with the original post, it was only a thought.
Thanks Phil for your input.

Randy

Leaseit is offline   Reply With Quote